Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Government

‘Smoking Gun’ Documents Prove White House Censorship Campaign to Ban Books on Amazon


The White House has once again been exposed for violating the First Amendment rights of Americans.

The Biden administration isn’t guilty of digital or social media censorship in this case, but banning books.

House Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, revealed the disturbing case of the Biden administration’s unconstitutional activity in a thread on the social media platform X.

THE AMAZON FILES – “feeling pressure from the White House”

Internal docs subpoenaed by @JudiciaryGOP & @Weaponization indicate that @amazon bowed down to Biden White House pressure to censor BOOKS.

Never-before-released internal emails subpoenaed by @JudiciaryGOP reveal that the Biden White House pressured Amazon to censor books that expressed views the White House did not approve of.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

“Is the [Biden] Admin asking us to remove books”?

Andy Slavitt—the senior Biden White House official who demanded that Facebook censor a meme and true information—was pressuring Amazon at the same time.

On March 2, 2021, Slavitt fired off an email demanding to know who he and his White House colleagues could talk to at the company about “the high levels of propaganda and misinformation and disinformation of [sic] Amazon?”

How did the Biden White House conclude that there was “propaganda and misinformation” in books sold in Amazon’s bookstore?

The White House ran keyword searches for controversial topics, such as “vaccine,” and emailed Amazon when it didn’t like how the search results appeared:

Initially, Amazon decided to hold off on “doing a manual intervention” to censor books.

Why? Not out of any commitment to free speech, but because doing so would be “too visible” to the American public and likely to spur criticism from conservative media.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Why was the Biden White House so upset with Amazon?

Because Amazon believed “retailers are different than social media communities” & provided their “customers with access to a variety of viewpoints.”

For the Biden Admin, letting Americans think for themselves was unacceptable.

A week later, on March 9, 2021, Amazon met with the White House.

Internal Amazon documents reveal Amazon’s “top talking points” going into the meeting.

One of the key questions was whether the Biden White House wanted books banned or just buried deep in the search results:

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

So how did Amazon’s meeting with the Biden White House go?

Advertisement
Advertisement

On March 2, 2021, Amazon determined internally that it would “not be doing a manual intervention today.”

The online bookstore set a meeting with senior Biden White House officials for March 9, 2021.

What was the purpose of this meeting with the Biden White House?

To see if “the Admin is asking us to remove books, or are they more concerned about search results/order (or both)?”

Why did Amazon agree to take this meeting? Because they were “feeling pressure from the White House”

After the White House spent a week berating Amazon, what did the online bookstore do?

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Starting March 9—the same day as its meeting with the White House—Amazon enabled “Do Not Promote” for books that expressed the view that vaccines were not effective.

And that wasn’t all. Amazon also considered other ways “to reduce the visibility” of certain books that the Biden White House disliked.

That’s right.

Amazon caved to the pressure from the Biden White House to censor speech.

@JudiciaryGOP and @Weaponization are investigating.

Andrew Slavitt, a senior health officer who was on President Joe Biden’s coronavirus response team, was set to testify before the House Judiciary Committee on January 31.

But the former COVID-19 senior adviser was forced to defy a congressional subpoena last week after the White House advised him not to comply due to worries about his attendance.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

“To protect the constitutional separation of powers and the institutional interests of the White House, I write to inform you that the White House does not authorize Mr. Slavitt to appear at the Committee’s scheduled deposition,” White House counsel Richard Sauber wrote to Slavitt’s attorney one day before the scheduled deposition.

The White House thus cares about the constitutional “separation of powers,” but not Americans’ First Amendment Rights.

During normal times, this would be considered a massive scandal and frontpage news.

Under the Biden presidency, however, it is another day, another scandal for this lawless administration.

Follow Kyle Becker on X @kylenabecker.



Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Comments
Advertisement

Trending

Latest

You May Also Like

Government

New York Attorney General Letitia James has taken the first steps towards seizing one of former President Donald Trump’s properties. The leftist attorney general...

Government

Businessman Vivek Ramaswamy has called for Attorney General Letitia James to be disbarred over her civil fraud case against Donald Trump and the $454...

Government

U.S. Rep. Katie Porter could hardly contain her excitement when predicting that Donald Trump will soon “meet his demise” during an interview with Pod...

Government

On Tuesday attorneys for former President Donald Trump filed suit against ABC host George Stephanopoulos after he incorrectly claimed that he was found guilty...

Government

On Tuesday attorneys for former President Donald Trump filed suit against ABC host George Stephanopoulos after he incorrectly claimed that he was found guilty...

Government

Former President Donald Trump refuses to quit on America. After four political prosecutions, 91 criminal charges leveled against him, a maximum penalty of 136...

Government

New York Attorney General Letita James has confirmed that she is prepared to seize former President Donald Trump’s properties if he is unable to...

Government

Dr. Phil McGraw, best known for being a consulting doctor for Oprah Winfrey and a powerhouse media personality in his own right for his...

Government

Tony Ganios, renowned for his role in the 1981 beloved movie “Porky’s,” has passed away at the age of 64. Amanda Ganios, his fiancée,...

Tucker

Mass immigration is completely destroying our country. Why is no one doing anything about it? Because they’re afraid of ending up like Lydia Brimelow....

Advertisement